The Laundering Pipeline: How One Express Column Became a Multi-Outlet Narrative Attack on the Sussex Australia Tour

On April 14, 2026, coverage surrounding Harry and Meghan’s Australian visit quickly established a narrative framing them as exploitative and damaging to the monarchy. Drawing on incendiary language from a Daily Express column, subsequent articles reinforced this perspective, while omitting context about the couple’s charitable activities and media distortion. Continue reading The Laundering Pipeline: How One Express Column Became a Multi-Outlet Narrative Attack on the Sussex Australia Tour

GB News Called Them “Despised.” Hundreds of Australians Said Otherwise.

On the same day Prince Harry and Meghan visited Melbourne’s Royal Children’s Hospital warmly welcomed by families, a GB News panel inaccurately claimed they are “despised” by the public. This hostile rhetoric contrasts sharply with the positive reception observed, revealing a disconnect between media narratives and actual public sentiment towards the couple. Continue reading GB News Called Them “Despised.” Hundreds of Australians Said Otherwise.

The Defendants’ Syllogism Has a Hole in It

The Wayfarer Parties’ renewed motion for judgment on the pleadings, derived from Judge Liman’s ruling, appears strong but is likely to fail. The court has already determined that Lively’s belief in opposing harassment was reasonable. Additionally, Lively’s filed complaint with the CRD provides a separate basis for protected activity, undermining the defendants’ argument. Continue reading The Defendants’ Syllogism Has a Hole in It

TAG Files Summary Judgment Motion on Aiding and Abetting Claim — But Does the Argument Hold Up?

The Agency Group PR LLC filed a motion for summary judgment on April 10, 2026, targeting Blake Lively’s retaliation claim under FEHA. TAG argues it lacks FEHA-related involvement as a crisis PR firm, while omitting a crucial reservation from the California Supreme Court concerning aiding-and-abetting liability. The case will determine TAG’s potential liability. Continue reading TAG Files Summary Judgment Motion on Aiding and Abetting Claim — But Does the Argument Hold Up?

Blake Lively Survived Three Claims: They Are the Ones That Matter.

Judge Lewis J. Liman’s ruling in Lively v. Wayfarer Studios permits Blake Lively to pursue three key claims regarding retaliation under California law, despite dismissing ten others. The court found sufficient evidence for a jury to consider whether the Wayfarer Parties mounted a campaign against her after her harassment report, setting the stage for a trial. Continue reading Blake Lively Survived Three Claims: They Are the Ones That Matter.

A Single Day in the Anti-Sussex Content Factory

On March 20, 2026, The Telegraph reported that threats against Prince Harry necessitate security, while the Daily Express published articles framing him and Meghan Markle negatively. The Express’s sensational headlines and focus on public backlash highlight a media strategy that generates hostile sentiment, influencing public policy against the Sussexes. Continue reading A Single Day in the Anti-Sussex Content Factory

Jury determined Musk artificially depressed Twitter’s stock price by roughly $3 to $8 per share between May and October 2022

A federal jury found Elon Musk intentionally misled Twitter investors during his 2022 acquisition, artificially lowering stock prices by $3 to $8 per share. The lawsuit, Pampena v. Musk, centers on Musk’s public statements questioning Twitter’s bot metrics. Class members may claim damages due to his misleading comments, marking a notable securities fraud case. Continue reading Jury determined Musk artificially depressed Twitter’s stock price by roughly $3 to $8 per share between May and October 2022

Prince Harry Should Get Full Protection Back

On March 16, Radar Online claimed that Prince William and Princess Catherine oppose any reconciliation with the Sussexes, while The Telegraph reported on government officials blocking Harry’s security due to potential public backlash. Together, these articles illustrate a feedback loop where media narratives influence public sentiment, affecting security decisions amidst a backdrop of documented threats to Harry. Continue reading Prince Harry Should Get Full Protection Back

The Word That Does the Work

The article examines how the term “polarising” is used in media to brand Meghan Markle, suggesting it transforms racial and gendered biases into market evaluations. It argues that this label shifts focus from systemic issues to personal attributes, perpetuating a narrative that reinforces institutional norms while obscuring the mechanisms of bias at play. Continue reading The Word That Does the Work

The Privilege Trap: How Pitt’s Discovery Strategy Backfired at the Court of Appeal

The California Court of Appeal’s Alternative Writ of Mandate in Pitt v. Jolie illustrates a pivotal moment in a complex legal battle. It requires the trial court to evaluate attorney-client privilege over 22 documents. The timeline reflects expedited actions, indicating strong appellate scrutiny of the prior ruling while both parties prepare for a prolonged struggle over privilege claims. Continue reading The Privilege Trap: How Pitt’s Discovery Strategy Backfired at the Court of Appeal